The Spectral Gravity Sub-Programme

Why do the Einstein equations follow from the projective spectral entropy functional? In Cosmochrony, gravitational dynamics is not postulated: it is the infrared-dominant $a_2$ response of the renormalized metric variation of $\mathcal{S}_\Pi[g] = \tfrac{1}{2}\log\det' A_g$. This page is the synthesis and the hub to all its papers.

Read the synthesis note DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20533351

Overview

The emergent geometry sub-programme (Presentation Note 2) reconstructs the effective Lorentzian metric $g^{\mu\nu} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}$ as a forced output of admissibility. What dynamics does this metric obey, and why does it take the Einstein form?

The spectral gravity sub-programme answers this in four stages built on a single functional, the projective spectral entropy $\mathcal{S}_\Pi[g] = \tfrac{1}{2}\log\det' A_g$ associated with the minimal admissible Laplace-type operator $A_g = -\nabla_g^2$. The Einstein tensor arises as the infrared $a_2$ response of the renormalized metric variation; the field equations $G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda_{\mathrm{ren}}g_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi G_N T_{\mu\nu}^{(\Pi)}$ are recovered as the Euler–Lagrange condition of a conditional variational principle, given supplied renormalized coefficients; the construction admits an Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld action as an admissible (not uniquely selected) ultraviolet completion, while its Lorentzian counterpart remains an open problem. This note covers the gravitational sector in the absence of matter; the joint gauge–gravity stratification belongs to Presentation Note 8.

Four stages, one functional. $\mathcal{S}_\Pi[g]$ is the only input. The $a_2$ sector gives the Einstein tensor, but not the Newton constant: the proper-time cutoff is separated from zeta regularization, and the finite coefficient $c_{\mathrm{EH}}^{\mathrm{ren}}$, its sign, and hence $G_N > 0$ are matching data, not predictions. The heat-kernel quantity $u \sim L^{-2}$ is an eigenvalue scale, not a temperature, so no local first law follows from the heat kernel alone. What the spectral stationarity establishes is a conditional variational coupling (no horizon, no Rindler wedge, no Raychaudhuri theorem required); reading it as equilibrium is an interpretation, not a result. In Lorentzian signature the transverse-traceless kernel is posited, not derived — a Lorentzian counterpart of $\mathcal{S}_\Pi$ requires a closed-time-path in-in construction, which is open — and under that posit the massless branch is undeformed. The Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld action is an admissible UV completion, conditional on Hypothesis [H-ext] and on a supplied Einstein term; even under [H-ext] it is not uniquely selected — the admissible completers form an explicitly parametrised family (Gravity Theorem 1).

The structural chain

$\mathcal{S}_\Pi[g] = \tfrac{1}{2}\log\det' A_g \;\Longrightarrow\; \delta_g\mathcal{S}_\Pi \ni c_{\mathrm{EH}}^{\mathrm{ren}}\, G_{\mu\nu} \;\Longrightarrow\; G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda_{\mathrm{ren}}\,g_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi G_N T_{\mu\nu}^{(\Pi)} \;\Longrightarrow\; \sqrt{-\det(g + \ell_{\mathrm{sp}}^2 R)}.$

The stages arise from distinct constituent papers: the IR hierarchy from the heat-kernel $a_2$ coefficient of $\mathcal{S}_\Pi$, controlled by the ratio $L_4^2 = |\beta^{\mathrm{ren}}/c_{\mathrm{EH}}^{\mathrm{ren}}|$ of renormalized coefficients (Gravity); the Einstein–matter coupling as the Euler–Lagrange condition of the stationarity of $\Gamma_\Pi = \mathcal{S}_\Pi^{\mathrm{ren}} - W_\Pi$, given supplied renormalized coefficients (Thermodynamics); and the Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld action as an admissible — not uniquely selected — tensorial UV completion under conditions (C1)–(C5), conditional on Hypothesis [H-ext] and on a supplied Einstein term (Gravity Theorem 1, BornInfeld).

The chain is Riemannian throughout. A Lorentzian counterpart of $\mathcal{S}_\Pi$ is not available: obtaining one requires an in-in construction on a closed time path, which is open. Lorentz analyses a posited local four-derivative kernel and returns a negative result about it (see below), so the Lorentzian link in this chain is an open problem rather than a delivered stage.

Papers of the sub-programme

Conditions for an IR Einstein sector.

Einstein–matter coupling from spectral stationarity.

The Lorentzian truncation: a negative result.

Born–Infeld UV completion.

Inputs and outputs

Upstream inputs. Non-injectivity as a structural necessity for $\mathcal{S}_\Pi > 0$ (ENI); the effective four-dimensional Lorentzian manifold $(M, g^{\mu\nu} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu})$ with minimal admissible Laplace-type operator $A_g = -\nabla_g^2$ from the emergent geometry sub-programme (Presentation Note 2, Q5b–Q11); the spectral length scale $\ell_{\mathrm{sp}}$ from Branch I and the Born–Infeld saturation constant $c_{\mathrm{BI}}$ of the projection dynamics; the BI parity involution and minimal fibre condition from BornInfeld and O18.

Outputs. The Einstein equations $G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda_{\mathrm{ren}}g_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi G_N T_{\mu\nu}^{(\Pi)}$ in the matter-free IR, conditional on supplied renormalized coefficients; the conditional regime $G_N = O(\ell_{\mathrm{sp}}^2)$, holding only if the matched $c_{\mathrm{EH}}^{\mathrm{ren}}$ is cutoff-dominated and positive; the Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld action conditional on [H-ext] and on a supplied Einstein term; the $a_2 \to$ gravity, $a_4 \to$ gauge spectral stratification — consumed by Q12, Q13, the gauge–gravity stratification sub-programme (Note 8), and cosmological/phenomenological applications.

Status

Gravity in the matter-free infrared is conditionally established, not closed: the $a_2$ Einstein term dominates under $R\,L_4^2 \ll 1$, the hierarchy being set by the ratio $L_4^2 = |\beta^{\mathrm{ren}}/c_{\mathrm{EH}}^{\mathrm{ren}}|$ of renormalized coefficients rather than by $\ell_{\mathrm{sp}}$ alone (Gravity); the Einstein–matter coupling is recovered as the Euler–Lagrange condition of the stationarity of $\Gamma_\Pi$, given supplied renormalized coefficients (Thermodynamics). The Lorentzian sector is open: its transverse-traceless kernel is posited rather than derived, and under that posit the massless branch is undeformed, so the sub-programme supplies neither a gravitational-wave prediction nor an observational handle on $\ell_{\mathrm{sp}}$ (Lorentz). Scalar BI uniqueness and the parity involution are proved unconditionally (BornInfeld), as are the spectral carrier identification and the scalar BI reduction (Gravity Lemmas 2–3). The tensorial BI theorem (Gravity Theorem 1) is conditional on Hypothesis [H-ext] (admissible coherence extensivity, Lemma 1 only) and on a supplied Einstein term. Items remain open: the sign and magnitude of $c_{\mathrm{EH}}^{\mathrm{ren}}$, which are matching data rather than predictions of the determinant; the thermodynamic bridge, which requires a heat one-form, an energy notion, and a Carathéodory–Jauch–Roberts integrability theorem; the analytical proof of [H-ext]; the closed-time-path in-in construction that would yield a Lorentzian counterpart of $\mathcal{S}_\Pi$, together with the scalar and vector sectors and the full Lorentzian Einstein stationarity beyond linearisation; and the coupled $G_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi G_N T_{\mu\nu}$ with explicit matter, pending the Fermionic Matter Sub-Programme (Note 6). This note does not address Yang–Mills dynamics — that belongs to the gauge–gravity stratification sub-programme (Presentation Note 8).