Overview
Q2 established that the spin-3/2 sector obeys the same quantum structure as spin-1/2 via co-admissibility, and identified SU(2) as the stable fixed point of the admissibility flow on the binary icosahedral group. However, two steps remained open: the identification of the isotropic fibre state with the proto-state for spin-3/2, and the general extension to all admissible values of $j$.
Q3 closes both open steps. The core argument uses Born–Infeld indiscernibility and Schur's lemma: the bipartite proto-state must be invariant under the diagonal 2I-action on $V_{\chi_{2j+1}} \otimes V_{\chi_{2j+1}}$, and by Schur's lemma applied to the Clebsch–Gordan decomposition, the only such invariant state is the singlet $|\Omega_j\rangle$.
From the singlet identification, the universal correlator $E(\hat{a},\hat{b}) = -\tfrac{j(j+1)}{3}\,\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b}$ follows by direct computation, valid for all 5 admissible sectors $j \in \{1/2, 1, 3/2, 2, 5/2\}$ of the binary icosahedral group 2I.
Core contributions
- Diagonal 2I-invariance from Born–Infeld indiscernibility: Born–Infeld indiscernibility forces the bipartite proto-state to be invariant under the diagonal action of 2I on $V_{\chi_{2j+1}} \otimes V_{\chi_{2j+1}}$. This invariance condition is the structural input that makes the singlet identification unique.
- Singlet identification via Schur's lemma: the Clebsch–Gordan decomposition of $V_{\chi_{2j+1}} \otimes V_{\chi_{2j+1}}$ contains exactly one trivial (singlet) subrepresentation for each admissible $j$. By Schur's lemma, the unique diagonal-2I-invariant state is the singlet $|\Omega_j\rangle$: \[ |\Omega_j\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2j+1}}\sum_{m=-j}^{j}(-1)^{j-m}|j,m\rangle\otimes|j,-m\rangle. \]
- Universal correlator for all admissible $j$: from the singlet $|\Omega_j\rangle$, the bipartite correlator is computed directly: \[ E(\hat{a},\hat{b}) = \langle\Omega_j|\,(\hat{a}\cdot\mathbf{J})\otimes(\hat{b}\cdot\mathbf{J})\,|\Omega_j\rangle = -\frac{j(j+1)}{3}\,\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b}, \] holding for all 5 admissible sectors $j \in \{1/2, 1, 3/2, 2, 5/2\}$ of 2I.
- Closure of the open step of Q2: Q2 left open the identification of the isotropic fibre state with the proto-state for spin-3/2, and the general-$j$ extension. Q3 closes both by the Schur's lemma argument, which applies uniformly across all admissible sectors.
- Completion of the Q1–Q3 quantum programme: together with Q1 (phase coherence, spin-1/2) and Q2 (co-admissibility, spin-3/2, SU(2) fixed point), Q3 establishes that the full quantum structure of SU(2) representations emerges from admissibility without any quantum postulate.
Interpretation
The central insight of Q3 is the role of Schur's lemma as a uniqueness theorem. Once Born–Infeld indiscernibility forces diagonal 2I-invariance of the proto-state, the algebraic structure of representation theory does the rest: the singlet is the only candidate. No additional physical principle is needed.
The universality of the correlator formula $E(\hat{a},\hat{b}) = -\tfrac{j(j+1)}{3}\,\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b}$ across all admissible sectors reflects the fact that the admissibility constraints on 2I select exactly those representations for which SU(2) acts transitively on the unit sphere — the defining property of rotationally symmetric correlators.
Relation to the Cosmochrony programme
Q3 closes the quantum sector of the spectral admissibility programme opened by Q1 and extended by Q2. The Q1–Q3 chain establishes:
- Q1: phase coherence is a structural consequence of admissibility for spin-1/2; the singlet correlator and Tsirelson bound follow from O18 and O23.
- Q2: co-admissibility on 2I extends the result to spin-3/2; SU(2) is identified as the fixed point of the admissibility flow.
- Q3: Schur's lemma closes the identification for all admissible $j$; the universal correlator completes the derivation.
The result has direct implications for other parts of the programme. The universal correlator provides a falsifiable prediction: Bell-type correlations in the Cosmochrony framework should obey $E(\hat{a},\hat{b}) = -\tfrac{j(j+1)}{3}\,\hat{a}\cdot\hat{b}$ for all admissible $j$, which differs from the standard quantum mechanics result only for $j \neq 1/2$ (where $j(j+1)/3 \neq 1/4$) and could in principle be tested.
References
Jérôme Beau. Universal Spin-j Singlet from Admissibility: Completion of the SU(2) Quantum Sector, 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19979535