Companion to Effective Composition
The companion paper characterises, for a finite substrate without a supplied subsystem factorisation, the possibilistic support layer completely and the preparation layer for two reference classes, and explicitly leaves open the states-and-effects layer of the K4 composition contract: effect spaces, their bilinear pairing with states, local tomography, and any quantum tensor product.
This paper resolves that layer's finite, mono-system, and bipartite-composition content, importing Effective Composition's rank-one criterion exactly as it supplies it.
Six results, each a forced/imported pair
- Primitive convexity obstruction. The raw cylindrical-conditioning family is finite while its own convex hull is a continuum, for any local outcome set of size at least two, with no genericity hypothesis. Conditioning inside a projection fibre does not rescue this for free.
- Simplicial closure. An explicit classical-randomisation postulate closes the family onto the full probability simplex, locally and jointly, independently of the reference measure's rank.
- Representation vs.\ availability of effects. Affine effects on a simplex correspond to a cube of vectors — a bookkeeping fact, not a physical claim. A weak coarse-graining axiom already yields the full Boolean effect algebra; the full continuum needs a further, dual randomisation postulate, realised by an explicit multilinear reconstruction.
- Independence of the two randomisations. The state-side and effect-side randomisation postulates are logically independent. A common classical control resource reproduces both only under an explicit independence clause between its two interfaces — dropping it breaks bilinear consistency, by an exact numeric witness.
- Uniqueness of the composed effect. Given physical existence of a bipartite effect and compatibility with joint Dirac states, it is forced to equal the pointwise-product formula: no tensor product is imported to define it. Local composition reaches only rectangle effects, strictly fewer than all joint sharp effects — a CHSH-shaped separating witness shows this survives full local randomisation.
- Exact criterion for local tomography. Local tomography holds exactly when each side's effect family linearly spans its ambient space — strictly stronger than merely separating its own simplex — equivalently, when it separates states and its linear span contains the unit effect.
Why this matters
A finite admissibility contract, left to itself, does not drift toward quantum structure: it settles, at every layer examined, into the classical/simplicial regime, and only moves beyond it when a correspondingly explicit postulate is supplied. This is not a deficiency of the contract — it is a precise map of where the classical skeleton's authority ends, handed forward, typed axiom by typed axiom, to whatever phase or amplitude-modulus law is proposed to take the programme beyond it. The general preparation layer of Effective Composition, the tensor product as a supplied structure, and any phase/modulus law remain exactly as open as that companion paper left them.
The phase/modulus question is taken up, without deriving it, by Refinement Consistency Obstructs Nonlinear Power Lifts of Finite History Measures.