Admissible Non-Injective Transitions as the Primitive of Physical Description

Four admissibility axioms, temporal ordering, and a corrected open Heisenberg/Weil carrier-selection edge.

Overview

The Cosmochrony programme was initially formulated around an explicit relational substrate \(\chi\) and a relaxation mechanism. The Foundation paper (v1.13) is a theoretical refoundation organised around four proposed axioms and their consequences.

The four axioms are:

  • A1 — Local projective admissibility: physical transitions are locally admissible projections satisfying a bounded-flux constraint.
  • A2 — Structural non-injectivity: projections are inherently many-to-one; distinct substrate states may share the same observable image.
  • A3 — Proto-state coherence: unresolved configurations retain phase coherence — the proto-state is physically real, not merely epistemic.
  • A4 — Discrete transitions: admissible transitions are countable and locally finite.

The finite countermodel now shows that this axiom system does not derive the complete algebraic core: a non-trivial commutator need not be central and therefore does not select a finite Heisenberg group.

Role in the programme. The Foundation paper is the axiomatic spine. It is cited by all Q-series papers, HeisenbergStructure, and the noscale paper. The reading path ENI → Foundation → HeisenbergStructure → carrier obstruction → noscale separates the proposed architecture from the proved status correction.

Results and corrected status

Relation to established frameworks (v1.13)

A new section situates the four axioms A1–A4 relative to established formalisms — not by reduction, but by structural translation: identifying what each framework corresponds to in the emergent hierarchy and what it presupposes that the present framework derives.

Significance: keeping identifications explicit

In the original Cosmochrony formulation, the relational substrate \(\chi\), the relaxation mechanism, and the Heisenberg group structure were postulated as starting points. Foundation attempted to reduce that axiomatic footprint; the carrier-selection part of that attempt does not survive the finite countermodel.

The four axioms A1–A4 are not physical laws — they are minimal commitments about what a description of physical transitions must satisfy. The corrected reading is:

This correction does not invalidate calculations internal to the supplied carrier. It identifies the missing bridge and prevents those calculations from being mistaken for a derivation of their input.

Status and open directions

Corrected: the algebraic identification of the admissible fibre as \(\mathrm{Heis}_3(\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z})\) with Weil representation \(V_\rho\) is not proved.

Open: carrier selection comes first. The continuum limit and passage from the discrete group \(\mathrm{Heis}_3(\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z})\) to the continuous Heisenberg group \(\mathrm{Heis}_3(\mathbb{R})\) — Q5a version 3.0 withdraws the former Mosco route and proves the obstruction; the spatial limit is the open hypothesis [H-L] (Q5 open).

Open directions include:

Relation to the programme

The Foundation paper sits at the top of the logical dependency hierarchy. The recommended foundational reading path is:

ENIFoundationHeisenbergStructurecarrier obstructionnoscale

The Q-series then builds quantum mechanics, \(\mathrm{SU}(2)\) symmetry, and Lorentzian spacetime on top of the Foundation axioms combined with O-series spectral data.

References

Jérôme Beau. Admissible Non-Injective Transitions as the Primitive of Physical Description, 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20258438

Status correction and countermodel: doi:10.5281/zenodo.21710123.