The Lorentz-Capacity Sub-Programme

Where does the Lorentz factor $\gamma = (1-\beta^2)^{-1/2}$ come from, if Lorentzian geometry is not assumed as fundamental? In Cosmochrony, $\gamma$ is read as the temporal residual of a bounded Born–Infeld capacity budget rather than as a kinematic postulate, and it is placed in special relativity through a supplied Lorentzian co-metric and one named hypothesis, [H-cone]. This page synthesises the six papers of the sub-programme.

Read the synthesis preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20386737
Current Zenodo release: version 2.3 (2026-10-26). Official title: The Lorentz-Capacity Sub-Programme.

Overview

The Lorentz factor is usually introduced as part of the kinematics of special relativity, taken as foundational. In Cosmochrony the Lorentzian metric is meant to be an effective object of admissible non-injective projection; it is not yet reconstructed. The structural question is: where does $\gamma$ come from? The sub-programme answers it conditionally, by separating two roles fused in the standard presentation.

Capacity sphere vs Lorentzian metric. The Born–Infeld capacity relation $(F^\tau)^2 + \beta^2 = 1$ is a Euclidean norm constraint in capacity space; it supplies the projective load $\beta$ and the residual clock factor $F^\tau = \sqrt{1-\beta^2} = 1/\gamma$. It is not the Minkowski interval. The Lorentzian interval is a separate, supplied input: a co-metric of the conditional form of Q11, $\mathrm{diag}(-A_\tau, 2\lambda, 2\lambda, 2\lambda)$, whose two coefficients are independent and fixed by no source (Q5b version 2.3, Q8 version 2.0 and Q10 version 2.0.1 establish no coefficient value). After a rescaling of $\tau$ it is proportional to $\eta$, and the normalisation $g^{\mu\nu} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}$ is a choice of units. The two structures are linked by the hypothesis [H-cone]: the light-cone speed of the co-metric equals the Born–Infeld bound per ordering step. This is the coupling datum that Q11 leaves open, and no source derives it.

The structural chain

$\text{BI budget} \;\to\; F^\tau = \tfrac{1}{\gamma} \;\to\; g^{\mu\nu} \propto \eta^{\mu\nu}\ \text{and [H-cone]} \;\to\; \Lambda(\beta) \;\to\; R(x)^2 = 1-\epsilon(x) \;\to\; \text{finite-}q\text{ domain.}$

The co-metric step is supplied, under the hypotheses of Q11 Corollary 6.1, and the arrow to $\Lambda(\beta)$ uses [H-cone]; the sub-programme uses only the signature, the decoupled temporal block and the isometry group of the co-metric, never a coefficient value.

Each arrow has a distinct logical status. The quadratic capacity relation, a hypothesis expressing the capacity bound, fixes the residual temporal capacity $F^\tau = \sqrt{1-\beta^2}$. Under [H-cone] the Lorentz boost $\Lambda(\beta)$ is, on the tangent space, the unique proper orthochronous isometry fixing the transverse directions and mapping one inertial splitting to another at load $\beta$. A local occupancy field $\epsilon(x)$ then reduces the residual temporal capacity, its identification with the metric lapse being a declared postulate, and the finite-$q$ correction bounds the domain in which continuum Carnot estimates of the spatial load are valid.

Papers of the sub-programme

Inputs and outputs

Upstream inputs. The Born–Infeld capacity bound, expressed by the quadratic budget hypothesis, supplies the unit capacity form $(F^\tau)^2 + \beta^2 = 1$; projective temporal ordering supplies a candidate temporal proxy along a trajectory, non-decreasing only within a numerical tolerance (exact monotonicity is conjectural, and an order on states requires [H-acyc]), with no step and no coefficient, the clock-rate reading of $F^\tau$ being that of TempProj under [H-cone]; the co-metric is supplied in the conditional form of Q11, with two independent coefficients; [H-cone] is assumed.

Outputs. Special-relativistic kinematics (time dilation, light cone, Lorentz boosts, length contraction), conditional on the supplied co-metric and on [H-cone]; the parallel structural definitions $R(x)^2 = 1-\epsilon(x)$ and $R(x)^2 = g_{\tau\tau}(x)/g_{\tau\tau}^{\infty}$, whose equivalence is open; and finite-$q$ control of the Carnot identification.

Status

The inertial kinematic chain is complete conditionally on a supplied co-metric and on [H-cone], while the non-homogeneous capacity-metric bridge remains open. In this sense, under the stated hypotheses, the Lorentz factor is read as the temporal residual of a bounded admissible projection rather than postulated, and the Lorentz group is not imposed on the capacity sphere but is the isometry group of the supplied effective co-metric. Deriving [H-cone] is the open coupling problem Q11-O1.