Overview
This internal note fixes the numerical observable for the absolute normalisation of the angular generation split of Q14 §6, and reports the Weil–BFS computations of it. A short Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff reduction in $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ identifies the per-step $J_\Pi$-odd $J_3$ component of the metaplectic cascade generator with the oriented product $ts$ of the two shear parameters, produced by the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ commutator $[E,F]=H$ (Q14, Proposition 6.5), and not with a free shear parameter. In the $\mathrm{SL}(2)$-on-$V$ model of Q14 the computation uses only the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ relations and no Heisenberg bracket; in the oscillator (Weil) realisation the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ generators are quadratic in the Heisenberg generators, and no map between the two brackets is supplied here.
The observable proposed for the Weil–BFS cascade is the accumulated oriented central-phase increment $A_c$ of the Heisenberg lift, normalised by the projected capacity $\widehat{I}(n)$. That $A_c$ carries the $J_3$ signal is an input of this note, not a consequence of the reduction: the increment $ts$ and the Heisenberg cocycle have the same form, which is an analogy and not an identification. Under this input, at the intrinsic saturation rank $n_3^{\mathrm{obs}}$ the normalised increment equals $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{Weil}}(n_3^{\mathrm{obs}})$, to be compared with the dictionary value $\varepsilon = 1/10$ without fitting.
Core contributions
- $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ reduction. The per-step $J_\Pi$-odd $J_3$ component of the metaplectic cascade generator is the oriented product $ts$ of the two shear parameters, produced by the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ commutator $[E,F]=H$ (Q14, Proposition 6.5), not a free shear parameter; the computation in the $\mathrm{SL}(2)$-on-$V$ model uses no Heisenberg bracket.
- The observable. Accumulated oriented central-phase increment $A_c$ of the Heisenberg lift, normalised by the projected capacity $\widehat{I}(n)$; at $n_3^{\mathrm{obs}}$ it equals $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{Weil}}(n_3^{\mathrm{obs}})$ and is to be compared to the dictionary $\varepsilon = 1/10$ without fitting. That $A_c$ carries the $J_3$ signal is an input of the note, its resemblance to the shear product being an analogy and not an identification.
- O12 fingerprint factorisation. The two sectors are the two terms of the fingerprint exponent: the frequency $B_c$ carries the radial capacity $\sigma_c$, the central phase $A_c$ is, under that input, the carrier of the angular split.
- Symmetric BFS null result. Direct evaluation on symmetric BFS shells returns $\Theta_{\mathrm{raw}} = 0$ identically: the symmetric capacity data fix the radial sector but cannot select an oriented angular branch. The orientation prescription is an irreducible input prior to $\mathcal{N}_A$.
- Capacity audit: the onset coefficient. A subsequent audit on the exact Heisenberg–BFS frontier fixes the onset central-phase coefficient: the directed outgoing-frontier mean is an exact rational sequence ($1/3, 5/9, 2/3, \dots$ per shell, $q$-independent over the first six shells for $q \in \{61,101,151,211,307\}$ only), whose first-shell (onset) value is $1/3$, hence the maximal-locking bound at the onset shell $\theta_{\max}^{(1)} = 2\pi/(3q)$ (exact for the standard generating campaign, generator-dependent). The $\widehat I$-normalised bound at $n_3^{\mathrm{obs}} = 2$ is $2.114/q$, $2.122/q$, $2.118/q$ for $q = 61, 101, 151$, that is $0.9$–$1.3\,\%$ above the onset value. This fixes the onset coefficient, not the dictionary value: since $\theta_{\max}^{(1)} \to 0$ with $q$, the comparison with $\varepsilon = 1/10$ is a required-normalisation diagnostic (the geometric $\mathrm{Sym}^2$ normalisation $3q/(20\pi)$ is the algebra at the onset shell), leaving $\varepsilon$ gated by the same ADE datum; within the input that $A_c$ carries the $J_3$ signal, no value of $\mathcal{N}_A$ turns $\Theta_{\mathrm{raw}} = 0$ into a split. The per-shell rationals are recomputed from the AAR repository alone.
Position in the programme
This note belongs to the fermionic matter sub-programme (Presentation Note 6). Together with the PRS note (operator-side Schur form of the compression remainder, conditional localisation of $u$) and the Q11OF note (frontier diagnostic), it sets up the locked frame in which the remaining quantitative step of the fermionic sector — the cascade normalisation $\mathcal{N}_{\mathrm{casc}}$ — can be carried out.
References
Jérôme Beau. Angular Amplitude Reduction: the Oriented Shear Product of the $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$ Step and the Central-Phase Observable of the Weil Cascade. Working paper, 2026. 10.5281/zenodo.20601228